<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Moishe Alexander and Canadian Funding Corporation Review CMHC Reports&#187; year</title>
	<atom:link href="http://moishe-alexander-cmhc.com/tag/year/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://moishe-alexander-cmhc.com</link>
	<description>Reviews of CMHC Housing Reports by Moishe Alexander</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 18:17:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Moncton CMA</title>
		<link>http://moishe-alexander-cmhc.com/2010/01/moncton-cma/</link>
		<comments>http://moishe-alexander-cmhc.com/2010/01/moncton-cma/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 18:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CMHC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[affordable housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moishe alexander]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[area]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bedroom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dieppe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dieppe City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[East Moncton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[level]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moncton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moncton City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moshe Alexander  Results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Moncton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[number]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[October]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Riverview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[survey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vacancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[West Moncton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[year]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moishe-alexander-cmhc.com/?p=498</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Posted by Moshe Alexander Results from Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation&#8217;s recently completed Rental Market Survey* revealed a higher vacancy rate for the Moncton CMA in the fall of 2009. In October of this year, the number of vacant units in Greater Moncton stood at 375. In comparison, there were 234 vacant units recorded at [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Posted by Moshe Alexander</p>
<p>Results from Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation&#8217;s recently completed Rental Market Survey* revealed a higher vacancy rate for the Moncton CMA in the fall of 2009. In October of this year, the number of vacant units in Greater Moncton stood at 375. In comparison, there were 234 vacant units recorded at the time of last year&#8217;s Rental Market Survey. Consequently, the vacancy rate in Greater Moncton was up from last year&#8217;s level of 2.4 per cent to 3.8 per cent in the fall of 2009. The vacancy rate for the popular two bedroom units was consistent with the change in the overall vacancy rate, climbing from last year&#8217;s rate of 2.6 per cent to 3.6 per cent. This was not unexpected as two bedroom units account for approximately two thirds of the rental universe in the Moncton CMA. The vacancy rate for one bedroom units reached four per cent in the fall of 2009. This marked a significant increase from the low 1.5 per cent vacancy rate recorded last October. A general desire on behalf of local renters for the increased living space provided by two bedroom units has effectively reduced demand for one bedroom units. Within the tri-community area, Dieppe City had the lowest vacancy rate at 2.2 per cent, followed by the Town of Riverview and Moncton City at 3.4 and 4.0 per cent, respectively. In the outlying areas of the Moncton CMA, the vacancy rate rebounded from last year&#8217;s low of 0.9 per cent, climbing to 3.1 per cent. * The survey, completed during the first two weeks of October, is limited to privately initiated structures comprised of at least three rental units that were available for rent or completed before June 30, 2009.</p>
<p>In 2009, economic development in Greater Moncton continued to follow the same positive trend that has defined the region over the past decade. Overall employment, as of the end of October, was on pace to exceed last year&#8217;s record setting level. As a result of the stronger job market, Greater Moncton has enjoyed the strongest in-migration of all regions in the province during the past ten years. Housing market conditions in the Moncton CMA, starting last year, have become increasingly favorable to potential home owners. In particular, mortgage rates have remained at historically low levels and new listings have retreated moderately from record levels set in 2008. As a result, home ownership has moved within reach for a larger number of people in Greater Moncton, including those who currently are renters, thus limiting demand for rental units. In the tri-community area, the rental market in the Town of Riverview remained the most stable during the past 12 months, with the local vacancy rate remaining unchanged at 3.4 per cent. Rental unit demand had been on the rise in Riverview in recent years. Despite higher than average apartment starts in both 2007 and 2008, the vacancy rate declined in both years. In 2009, a decline in rental unit demand was offset by reduced rental unit construction, leading to the local vacancy rate remaining unchanged. </p>
<p>In Moncton City, the vacancy rate was comparable to the overall rate for the CMA at 4.0 per cent. Population growth has remained positive in Moncton City proper as the region&#8217;s economy continues to support economic development and attract people to the area. However, in-migration in 2009 has slowed compared to last year&#8217;s above average pace. In addition, apartment starts in Moncton City in 2008 were higher than the average for the last five years. This resulted in a relatively large infusion of new units in 2009 as projects started last year were completed. As such, local supply was ahead of demand with Moncton City&#8217;s vacancy rate rising to 4.0 per cent from last year&#8217;s level of 2.4 per cent. The vacancy rates in each of Moncton City&#8217;s four separate zones also increased in 2009. The largest fluctuation occurred in East Moncton. Last year, this zone posted Moncton City&#8217;s lowest vacancy rate at 1.9 per cent. In the fall of 2009, the vacancy rate in East Moncton was the highest at 4.6 per cent. In contrast, North Moncton had the lowest vacancy rate at 2.7 per cent. Not only was it the lowest, it was also the least changed among Moncton City&#8217;s four different zones, climbing 0.6 percentage points from last year&#8217;s rate of 2.1 per cent. In Central and West Moncton, the vacancy rate in the fall of 2009 was up to 4.5 and 3.6 per cent, respectively.</p>
<p>In the City of Dieppe, the vacancy rate inched up to 2.2 per cent in the fall of 2009, a moderate increase from 1.8 per cent last year. In general terms, population growth in Dieppe has outpaced both Moncton and Riverview in recent years. As a result, residential development has flourished in Dieppe. During this time, the popularity of semi-detached homes has increased resulting in tremendous growth in the Moncton CMA, with a significant number of new units added in the City of Dieppe as well. With semi-detached homes, consumers can obtain a newly-built product with a mortgage payment comparable to the typical monthly rent for a newer two bedroom apartment, while allowing the owner to build equity in their new home. As such, semi-detached units in Dieppe, which have nearly matched last year&#8217;s record setting pace in 2009, continue to lure renters to homeownership. This year, apartment starts are expected to post the third annual decline in Dieppe. However, with fewer consumers seeking rental units, supply and demand have maintained a relative balance, resulting in a moderate 0.4 percentage point change in Dieppe&#8217;s vacancy rate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://moishe-alexander-cmhc.com/2010/01/moncton-cma/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RENTAL MARKET REPORT</title>
		<link>http://moishe-alexander-cmhc.com/2010/01/rental-market-report-3/</link>
		<comments>http://moishe-alexander-cmhc.com/2010/01/rental-market-report-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 18:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CMHC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[affordable housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moishe alexander]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[area]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[calgary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dartmouth City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Halifax City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HRM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[increase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moshe Alexander  The]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[October]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[percentage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quebec city]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[St]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supply]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vacancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windsor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[year]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moishe-alexander-cmhc.com/?p=495</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Posted by Moshe Alexander The overall vacancy rate in Halifax stood at 2.9 per cent in October, down from 3.4 per cent last fall. Vacancy rates in the Halifax Regional Municipality (HRM) trended down in all submarkets but one in 2009. Average rents, based on structures common to both the 2008 and 2009 surveys, were up 2.8 per cent. In the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Posted by Moshe Alexander</p>
<p>The overall vacancy rate in Halifax stood at 2.9 per cent in October, down from 3.4 per cent last fall. Vacancy rates in the Halifax Regional Municipality (HRM) trended down in all submarkets but one in 2009. Average rents, based on structures common to both the 2008 and 2009 surveys, were up 2.8 per cent. In the HRM, Halifax City saw the largest decline in vacancies as the rate fell from 2.7 to 2.0 per cent in 2009. The Mainland North area of Halifax City saw the vacancy rate fall a full percentage point to 1.6 per cent. This submarket has a significant impact on the overall HRM vacancy rate as it is home to 28 per cent of the rental stock &#8211; the most of any submarket. On the other side of the harbor, Dartmouth City saw a more modest decline in vacancies from a rate of 5.5 to 5.2 per cent in 2009. Dartmouth North again saw the highest vacancy rate in the HRM at 5.6 per cent in 2009 while Dartmouth East recorded the only increase in vacancies &#8211; climbing from 4.4 to 5.4 per cent. The Metro Halifax vacancy rate of 2.9 per cent is only slightly higher than the national average of 2.8 per cent. Apart from Windsor, Halifax saw the largest decline in vacancies in 2009</p>
<p>with a 0.5 percentage point decrease. Canadian cities with the lowest vacancy rates in 2009 were Quebec City, Regina and St. John&#8217;s with rates of 0.6, 0.6 and 0.9 per cent respectively. Three of the cities with the highest vacancy rates, Calgary, Peterborough and Abbotsford also saw the largest increases in 2009 as vacancies climbed more than three percentage points in each of these major centres. Vacancy rates have remained relatively stable in Halifax for the past decade. In fact, the 2009 vacancy rate of 2.9 is only slightly below the ten-year average vacancy rate of 3.0 per cent. The vacancy rate has not fluctuated much over that time period, in spite of significant levels of new construction and new rental units being added to the supply. Over the past ten years, there have been approximately 585 new rental units added to the supply each year. Currently, there are nearly 600 more rental units under construction (as of October 2009) in the HRM most of which will be completed over the next 12 to 18 months. It is expected that current demand will be sufficient to offset the additional supply and keep vacancy rates within the recent ten-year range. Average rents in Halifax, increased by 2.8 per cent in 2009 compared to 2.0 per cent growth in both 2007 and 2008. This percentage increase is based on a fixed sample methodology including structures common to both this year&#8217;s and last year&#8217;s survey. Rents increased in response to the elevated demand that pushed vacancy rates downward. Based solely on this year&#8217;s sample, the average rent for a two- bedroom unit in Halifax was $877 in 2009. * The survey, completed during the first two weeks of October, is limited to privately initiated structures comprised of at least three rental units that were available for rent or completed before June 30, 2009.</p>
<p>Demand for two-bedroom units increased the most in Halifax in 2009. Two-bedroom units account for nearly 50 per cent of the rental stock in the city and saw the largest decline in vacancy rates from 4.2 to 3.3 per cent in 2009. The decrease in two-bedroom vacancies was largely impacted by the halving of the vacancy rate in Mainland North from 3.0 to 1.5 per cent. One and three-bedroom units saw more moderate vacancy rate declines from 2.8 to 2.4 per cent and from 2.9 to 2.7 per cent respectively. Bachelor units were the only bedroom-type to see an increase in the vacancy rate from 2.1 to 2.5 per cent in 2009. The vacancy rate in the south end of the Peninsula remained unchanged at 1.3 per cent with this area continuing to report the lowest rate in the HRM. Dartmouth North saw its vacancy rate decline from 6.1 to 5.6 per cent in 2009, but retained its 2008 position as having the highest vacancy rate in Halifax.</p>
<p>In terms of age, newer buildings continue to record the lowest vacancy rates, albeit slightly higher than last year. In buildings built since 2000, the vacancy rate increased from 0.8 to 1.0 per cent. This rate is less than half the rate of buildings built prior to 2000. Buildings built prior to 1974 saw the largest decline in vacancy rates of 1.3 percentage points. The oldest buildings (i.e., those built prior to 1960) saw vacancies decline from 4.5 to 3.2 per cent while the next oldest group (i.e., those built between 1960 and 1974) saw vacancies decline from 5.7 to 4.4 per cent. Based on building size, larger buildings continued to record the lowest vacancy rates in the city. Buildings with more than 100 units saw vacancies decline from 2.6 to 2.1 per cent. Smaller buildings with six to 19 units saw the highest vacancy rate of 3.8 per cent in 2009, but also the largest decline from 4.8 per cent in 2008.</p>
<p>The overall average rent increased 2.8 per cent in 2009 based on units common to both the 2008 and 2009 surveys. Three-bedroom units saw the largest increase of 3.1 per cent, while one-bedroom units saw the lowest increase in average rents of 2.6 per cent. Just as in 2008, the average rent increases for two- bedroom units matched the overall HRM increase of 2.8 per cent. In terms of submarkets, Peninsula South saw the most growth in average rents at 4.2 per cent while Dartmouth North saw the lowest increase in average rents of 1.9 per cent. Based solely on the 2009 survey data, the average rent for a two-bedroom apartment in Halifax was $877 per month as of October. Peninsula South remains the highest priced market in the HRM with an average two- bedroom unit renting for $1,318 per month which is 50 per cent higher than the overall HRM average. All other submarkets saw rents below the overall average except for Peninsula North which is just one per cent above the average. The lowest average rents can be found in Dartmouth South and Mainland South where two-bedroom units rent for $683 and $728 per month respectively. Newer buildings continue to</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://moishe-alexander-cmhc.com/2010/01/rental-market-report-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Charlottetown CA</title>
		<link>http://moishe-alexander-cmhc.com/2010/01/charlottetown-ca/</link>
		<comments>http://moishe-alexander-cmhc.com/2010/01/charlottetown-ca/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 18:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CMHC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[affordable housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[area]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[availability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlottetown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CONSTRUCTION]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[increase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[level]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moshe Alexander  In]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[survey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vacancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[year]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moishe-alexander-cmhc.com/?p=493</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Posted by Moshe Alexander In 2001, the vacancy rate in Charlottetown reached a record low of 1.8 per cent, as the construction of rental units was somewhat limited throughout the 1990&#8242;s. In response to the low vacancy rate, local developers built higher levels of rental buildings from 2002 to 2006. This strong level of rental construction resulted [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Posted by Moshe Alexander</p>
<p>In 2001, the vacancy rate in Charlottetown reached a record low of 1.8 per cent, as the construction of rental units was somewhat limited throughout the 1990&#8242;s. In response to the low vacancy rate, local developers built higher levels of rental buildings from 2002 to 2006. This strong level of rental construction resulted in a rising vacancy rate from 2003 to 2007. Last fall this trend was reversed, as the vacancy rate declined for the first time in five years due to reduced rental construction in 2007 and 2008. However, the vacancy rate inched back up this year as rental starts are once again on the rise. The increased level of construction pushed the vacancy rate for apartment structures containing three or more units in the Charlottetown CA to 3.4 per cent up from 2.3 per cent last year. The October 2009 survey aggregated the rental information for 3,888 rental units in the Charlottetown area, which was up from the 2008 figure of 3,790 units. Of the surveyed units, 131 were vacant in 2009, compared to 86 vacant units during the same period last year. The 2009 survey revealed that vacancies among two-bedroom units, which make up the majority of the local rental universe, were higher with 78 vacant units, compared to 54 units last year. As a result, the vacancy rate for two-bedroom units rose to 3.1 per cent from 2.2 per cent last year. Among the other unit types the change was more pronounced. One- bedroom units recorded the largest change, as the vacancy rate for these units increased from 2.0 per cent last year to 4.4 per cent in 2009. </p>
<p>Overall, the average rent in Charlottetown was $658 per month in 2009. For the fourth year in a row, CMHC is measuring the change in rents for existing structures (i.e., those common to the current and previous years&#8217; surveys). Focusing on existing structures excludes the impact of new structures added to the rental universe between surveys and provides a better indication of the rent increase for existing structures. For the Charlottetown CA, the average rent for all bedroom types in existing structures increased by 4.8 per cent in October 2009 compared to a year ago. This year&#8217;s increase of 4.8 per cent is very close to the 5.0 per cent increase allowed for heated premises by the Island Regulatory and Appeals Commission (IRAC), which manages residential rental increases on the Island. As most of the units in the Charlottetown area include heat in the rent, it is not unexpected that the actual increase mirrored the increase allowed by IRAC. In 2009, there was very little reason to discount rents now that all of the projects built over the past six years have been integrated into the market. Also, owners were looking to increase rents in an effort to make up for the high heating costs experienced in the 2007/2008 winter due to the rapid rise in the price of heating oil. There was a significant difference in the increase in two-bedroom rents recorded in Zone 1 (Downtown) and Zone 2 (Peripheral). In Zone 1, the average two-bedroom rent advanced by 3.9 per cent, while in Zone 2 the increase was more impressive at 5.8 per cent, as measured by the fixed sample.</p>
<p>In addition to the vacancy and rent data that is collected each year as part of the annual Rental Market Survey, landlords and property managers were asked about rental unit availability. A rental unit is considered available if the existing tenant has given, or has received, notice to move, and a new tenant has not signed a lease; or the unit is vacant. Based on the results from the 2009 Rental Market Survey, the availability rate in the Charlottetown CA moved up to 4.9 per cent in 2009 from last year&#8217;s level of 4.0 per cent. Within the CA, the availability rate was identical in both Zones 1 and 2 at 4.9 per cent. Among the different bedroom types, one-bedroom units posted the highest availability rate in 2009 at 5.8 per cent. The availability rate for bachelor and two-bedroom units was 4.8 per cent for both.</p>
<p>According to the 2009 Rental Market Survey, the largest apartment buildings in the Charlottetown area command the highest average rents and enjoy the lowest vacancy rates. In the October survey, apartment buildings in the Charlottetown area with between 50 and 99 units posted the lowest vacancy rate at 1.8 per cent, which was well below the overall vacancy rate of 3.4 per cent. The second largest buildings in the area, ranging from 20 to 49 units, also saw lower vacancies with a rate of 3.0 per cent. In addition to having the lowest vacancy rate, the largest buildings also commanded the highest average rents. Buildings with 50 to 99 units had an average rent of $760, while the smallest structures, those with three to five units recorded an average monthly rent of $608. This escalation of rents from smaller to larger buildings is logical, when considering that more amenities tend to be offered to tenants as the building size increases. These features such as elevators, underground parking, security measures and common rooms raise the construction and operating costs for owners, which in turn are passed on to tenants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://moishe-alexander-cmhc.com/2010/01/charlottetown-ca/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thunder Bay CMA</title>
		<link>http://moishe-alexander-cmhc.com/2010/01/thunder-bay-cma/</link>
		<comments>http://moishe-alexander-cmhc.com/2010/01/thunder-bay-cma/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 17:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CMHC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[affordable housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[availability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homeownership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moshe Alexander  The]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Northern Ontario]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Northwestern Ontario]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[October]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ontario]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pressure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sudbury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thunder Bay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vacancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[year]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moishe-alexander-cmhc.com/?p=488</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Posted by Moshe Alexander The vacancy rate among apartments with at least three units (3+) in the Thunder Bay Census Metropolitan Area (CMA) inched up to 2.3 per cent in October 2009, from 2.2 per cent last year, according to Rental Market Survey (RMS) data released in December by Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC). [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Posted by Moshe Alexander</p>
<p>The vacancy rate among apartments with at least three units (3+) in the Thunder Bay Census Metropolitan Area (CMA) inched up to 2.3 per cent in October 2009, from 2.2 per cent last year, according to Rental Market Survey (RMS) data released in December by Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC). (See Table 1.1.1) With the October vacancy rate&#8217;s slight increase, Thunder Bay now becomes the CMA with the tenth lowest vacancy rate for 33 centres with populations over 100,000 in Canada. Northern Ontario&#8217;s other major centre, Sudbury saw its rate rise to 2.9 per cent from 0.7 per cent last year. Meanwhile, elsewhere in Northwestern Ontario, Kenora&#8217;s vacancy rate declined to 0.8 per cent from 1.7 per cent in October 2008. </p>
<p>The vacancy rate in Thunder Bay was up only slightly this year as several opposing forces came into play. Improvement in homeownership affordability caused by falling interest rates has encouraged some renters to become homeowners. Low ownership costs in Thunder Bay combined with rising apartment rents reduced the relative cost of homeownership &#8211; dampening demand for rental accommodation. There are other factors that have added to rental demand and exerted downward pressure on vacancy rates. Although there has been a long-term out-migration amongst the 18 to 24 renter aged group, important trends emerged recently. Employment in the service sector and 18-24 age groups have held up reasonably well, possibly exerting slight upward pressure on rental demand, as young adults are more likely to rent rather than own. Overall, employment has fallen 5.5 per cent over the past year between the 2008 and 2009 surveys. However, the brunt of the job losses has been in the goods-producing sector and the 25-44 age group, arguably sectors not directly associated with rental demand. Next, demand coming from students in post-secondary institutions has increased rental demand. Enrolment in post-secondary institutions has been growing in Thunder Bay. Less space in student housing has caused spillover in the private market creating demand for units located in proximity to Lakehead University and Confederation College. Laid off workers returning to school as mature students are creating additional demand for private rentals. In addition, recent data has indicated no new sources of rental supply. Going back to 1998, there have been few rental completions added to the supply of rental units in Thunder Bay.</p>
<p>The availability rate1 is a slightly broader measure of what landlords have available to market to prospective tenants. The availability rate refers to the percentage of apartments that are either vacant or for which the existing tenant has given or received notice to move. Once again, availability rates moved in the same direction as the vacancy rate in Thunder Bay. Thunder Bay&#8217;s availability rate rose to 3.1 per cent from 2.7 per cent in 2008. Only one of the 15 metropolitan areas in Ontario had a lower availability rate than Thunder Bay, namely Kingston (2.5 per cent). Higher availability rates are a result of higher turnover. (See Table 1.4.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://moishe-alexander-cmhc.com/2010/01/thunder-bay-cma/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sudbury CMA</title>
		<link>http://moishe-alexander-cmhc.com/2010/01/sudbury-cma/</link>
		<comments>http://moishe-alexander-cmhc.com/2010/01/sudbury-cma/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 17:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CMHC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bedroom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homeownership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moshe Alexander  A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nickel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[October]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sudbury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vacancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[year]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moishe-alexander-cmhc.com/?p=486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Posted by Moshe Alexander A number of factors have exerted upward pressure on Sudbury&#8217;s vacancy rate. Between October 2008 and October 2009, employment in the mining and related service sector has fallen. The challenges facing global demand for stainless steel have impacted Sudbury&#8217;s nickel industry and services related specifically to this sector. While the latest [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Posted by Moshe Alexander</p>
<p>A number of factors have exerted upward pressure on Sudbury&#8217;s vacancy rate. Between October 2008 and October 2009, employment in the mining and related service sector has fallen. The challenges facing global demand for stainless steel have impacted Sudbury&#8217;s nickel industry and services related specifically to this sector. While the latest migration results (2007-2008) for Sudbury CMA showed positive net in-migration for the sixth consecutive year, it is more likely that in-migration slowed as well since last fall due to less investment spending in the mining industry. Some of these residents affected by the changing fortunes of the nickel market, may have left Sudbury to find work causing the vacancy rate to rise if they resided in rental housing. Meanwhile, a slowing job market triggered less renter household formation, particularly among the core renter group of young adults aged 18-24, resulting in more young adults remaining in the parental home.</p>
<p>Another factor dampening rental demand has been the shift to homeownership. An improvement of homeownership affordability caused by falling interest rates has prompted some renters to become homeowners over the past year. Although overall sales are lower, affordable priced product is moving well suggesting first time buyers are active.</p>
<p>With the total stock increasing only marginally over the course of the year, changes in the vacancy rate are attributable to changes in rental market demand, rather than fluctuations in supply. There is only a slight change in the rental universe observed between October 2008 and 2009 underlining the lack of new supply or changes to the stock of rental units (See Table 1.1.3). There have been only 58 rental completions in the last ten years according to CMHC&#8217;s survey in Greater Sudbury, with 31 coming last year. While the overall vacancy rate climbed to 2.9 per cent, both one bedroom and two bedroom units saw vacancy rates rise by a similar magnitude. Sudbury&#8217;s one bedroom stock saw its vacancy rate rise to 2.8 cent from 0.9 per cent while the two bed apartment stock jumped to 2.5 per cent compared to 0.4 per cent last year. Units in direct competition with homeownership saw an increase in vacancy rates as young couples and/or unattached singles move from rental units into homeownership or leave the community altogether.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://moishe-alexander-cmhc.com/2010/01/sudbury-cma/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>St. Catharines-Niagara CMA</title>
		<link>http://moishe-alexander-cmhc.com/2010/01/st-catharines-niagara-cma/</link>
		<comments>http://moishe-alexander-cmhc.com/2010/01/st-catharines-niagara-cma/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 17:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CMHC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rental Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[affordable housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affordable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Age]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apartment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[demand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[job]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[level]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moshe Alexander  The]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Niagara]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[period]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toronto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vacancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[year]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Youth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moishe-alexander-cmhc.com/?p=484</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Posted by Moshe Alexander The vacancy rate for private rental apartment buildings with three or more units in the St. Catharines- Niagara CMA (hereinafter Niagara) was above the national and historical averages. According to the CMHC&#8217;s Fall 2009 Rental Market Survey, the vacancy rate edged up to 4.4 per cent in 2009. This was above [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Posted by Moshe Alexander</p>
<p>The vacancy rate for private rental apartment buildings with three or more units in the St. Catharines- Niagara CMA (hereinafter Niagara) was above the national and historical averages. According to the CMHC&#8217;s Fall 2009 Rental Market Survey, the vacancy rate edged up to 4.4 per cent in 2009. This was above the 20-year average level of 3.5 per cent, and an increase of 0.1 percentage point from last year. Four main factors placed upward pressure on the vacancy rate. First, record low mortgage rates in combination with lower prices in the earlier part of the year translated into very affordable mortgage carrying costs. Many buyers, in particular first- time buyers, took advantage and moved out of rental accommodation and into home ownership. A comparison of average rents and mortgage carrying costs based on the mortgage terms chosen by most first-time buyers (i.e., maximum amortization period and the minimum down payment allowed) suggests that the gap between the two narrowed by more than 50 per cent in the first quarter of 2009.</p>
<p>Also, youth aged 15 to 24 are a key source of rental demand. Weaker employment among youth in this age group meant that some of them, after losing their jobs, moved back into their parents&#8217; homes, or alternatively, postponed a decision to move out. Total employment for all age groups declined by around 11,000 people or 5.6 per cent when comparing the average level in the 12 months ending September 2009 to average level in the same period a year earlier.Youth employment declined by 4,500 people or 14 per cent, of which 2,900 in full- time positions and the rest in part- time jobs.</p>
<p>Finally, there were fewer international immigrants in 2009, due to the global economic slowdown. Since they traditionally tend to rent after landing in Canada, this implies that rental demand in 2009 was not as strong as in the previous years. Many international migrants find it difficult to settle in the region and land a job. Instead, they prefer to settle in major centres, such as the Greater Toronto Area, where they are more likely to find their first job and where there are established social networks. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://moishe-alexander-cmhc.com/2010/01/st-catharines-niagara-cma/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rental Market report Gatineau</title>
		<link>http://moishe-alexander-cmhc.com/2009/12/rental-market-report-gatineau/</link>
		<comments>http://moishe-alexander-cmhc.com/2009/12/rental-market-report-gatineau/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 15:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CMHC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ontario]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moishe alexander]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[area]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aylmer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gatineau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homeownership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hull]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[October]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proportion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trend]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vacancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[year]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moishe-alexander-cmhc.com/?p=447</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Posted by Moishe Alexander Highlights &#8211; Gatineau According to the results of the latest CMHC Rental Market Survey, the rental housing vacancy rate in the Quebec part of the Ottawa-Gatineau CMA reached 2.2 per cent in October 2009, up by 0.3 of a percentage point over a year earlier. The rental market therefore eased but [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Posted by Moishe Alexander</p>
<p>Highlights &#8211; Gatineau</p>
<p>According to the results of the latest CMHC Rental Market Survey, the rental housing vacancy rate in the Quebec part of the Ottawa-Gatineau CMA reached 2.2 per cent in October 2009, up by 0.3 of a percentage point over a year earlier. The rental market therefore eased but still remained relatively tight. The proportion of vacant units in the metropolitan area was in fact slightly lower than the average for Quebec overall (2.3 per cent). The relative stability of the vacancy rate in the Gatineau area was attributable to the fact that the continued homeownership trend was counterbalanced by strong migration.</p>
<p>Gatineau was not the only area where the rental market showed little change, however, as this was also the case in the Montréal, Québec and Saguenay CMAs. On the other hand, conditions eased in Sherbrooke and Trois-Rivières, two areas where the job losses among young people slowed the rate of household formation. Lastly, in the Ontario part of the Ottawa-Gatineau CMA, the proportion of vacant units remained below the level recorded in Gatineau, rising from 1.4 per cent in October 2008 to 1.5 per cent a year later.</p>
<p>The small rise in the vacancy rate recorded in the Gatineau area was due in part to the job losses that occurred over the past year. Following a particularly good year for job creation in 2008, with an annual gain of more than 5 per cent, the first ten months of 2009 were marked by the elimination of some 5,000 positions compared to the average level for 2008. As is often the case in difficult economic times, the youngest workers sustained the greatest losses, with the average number of jobs among people aged from 15 to 24 years falling by about 4,000 between 2008 and 2009. The slightly tougher labour market conditions therefore limited household formation in this age group and removed some pressure on rental housing demand.</p>
<p>The homeownership trend also contributed to the increase in the vacancy rate in 2009. Despite the economic uncertainties that prevailed at the beginning of the year, the low mortgage rates and the contribution of the public service to the regional economy helped maintain housing starts at high levels. As well, the Gatineau area saw the construction of record numbers of row homes, semi- detached houses and condominium apartments&#8211;all housing types that are more affordable than single-detached homes and often preferred by renters accessing homeownership.</p>
<p>However, migration limited the easing of the rental market. In fact, the latest migration data released by Statistics Canada revealed that, between 2007 and 2008, there were 2,800 more in-migrants than out-migrants. It should be specified that, just like in previous years, it was the international component of net migration that contributed the most to the demand for rental housing. During this period, more than 1,000 new residents came from abroad. This trend likely continued in 2008/2009.</p>
<p>Just like the overall metropolitan area, the Aylmer sector did not register a significant change in its vacancy rate compared to October 2008. It should be noted that Aylmer was the sector with the highest proportion of unoccupied apartments in the Gatineau area. In fact, 5 per cent of the apartments there did not have occupants this past fall, compared to 5.2 per cent a year earlier. In the other sectors, the vacancy rates all varied within a narrow range from 1.6 per cent to 2.6 per cent. The difference between these rates and the rate in Aylmer was likely due, firstto the higher rents in this sector and, second, to the steady homeownership trend there. In fact, Aylmer registered the largest volume of homeowner housing starts in the area. A number of renters who already lived in this sector certainly contributed to the surge in property sales there and to the fact that Aylmer once again had the highest proportion of vacant rental units in the metropolitan area.</p>
<p>In Hull, which has more than half of all the rental housing units in the Gatineau area, the vacancy rate remained unchanged, at 1.6 per cent, in October 2009. The popularity of this sector is attributable to its proximity to Canada&#8217;s capital and to the presence of institutions of higher learning. Despite the job losses observed among young people since the fall of 2008, which may have caused some not to renew their leases in July, the increase in student enrolment at the Cégep de l&#8217;Outaouais and the Université du Québec en Outaouais seems to have helped landlords rent out their available units. In fact, enrolment at these two institutions rose again this past fall. The gain was 3.3 per cent at the Université du Québec en Outaouais while, at the Cégep de l&#8217;Outaouais, enrolment reached a record level, mainly thanks to the recent addition of new health programs.</p>
<p>In the Gatineau sector, the proportion of vacant apartments reached 2.6 per cent in October 2009, up from 1.7 per cent in October 2008. Market conditions also eased in the outlying area, where the percentage of unoccupied units rose from 1.3 per cent in the fall of 2008 to 2.3 per cent this past fall. The arrival of many apartments in these sectors during the last year increased the supply of units. In fact, 87 rental dwellings were added in the outlying area between July 2008 and June 2009, compared to 16 the year before. The continued homeownership trend also caused some rental housing units to be vacated, a number of which were still unoccupied in October 2009.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://moishe-alexander-cmhc.com/2009/12/rental-market-report-gatineau/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rental Market report</title>
		<link>http://moishe-alexander-cmhc.com/2009/12/rental-market-report/</link>
		<comments>http://moishe-alexander-cmhc.com/2009/12/rental-market-report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 14:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CMHC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[job]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[majority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[migration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Montreal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[October]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rental]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[survey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vacancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[year]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moishe-alexander-cmhc.com/?p=444</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Posted by Moishe Alexander Vacancy rate stable in October 2009 According to the results of the Rental Market Survey conducted by CMHC in October 2009, the vacancy rate remained rather stable in the Montréal metropolitan area, reaching 2.5 per cent, compared to 2.4 per cent in October 20081. The stronger than expected homeownership trend, especially [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Posted by Moishe Alexander</p>
<p>Vacancy rate stable in October 2009</p>
<p>According to the results of the Rental Market Survey conducted by CMHC in October 2009, the vacancy rate remained rather stable in the Montréal metropolitan area, reaching 2.5 per cent, compared to 2.4 per cent in October 20081. The stronger than expected homeownership trend, especially starting in the second quarter, and the job losses among young people aged from 15 to 24 years offset the increase in migration, which kept the vacancy rate relatively stable over the past year. After easing from 2002 to 2006, the Montréal rental market has since stabilized. That being said, conditions remain relatively tight compared to the 1990s.</p>
<p>The difficult economic environment also had a direct impact on young renter clients. Nearly 15,000 jobs, most of them full-time, were lost among the group aged from 15 to 24 years between October 2008 and October 20092. Although the people in this age group account for only 7 per cent of renter households, a vast majority (89 per cent) of them rent their dwellings3 . The job losses very likely forced a number of these young people to stay with their parents or share their apartments with more roommates. Therefore, the difficult job market conditions for people aged from 15 to 24 years resulted in a decrease in demand for housing.</p>
<p>That said, the arrival of more immigrants acted as a counterbalance for the renters who left the rental market. According to our forecasts, net migration in the Montréal CMA should reach 30,000 people in 2009, up from 28,600 in 2008. Montréal received more immigrants this year, thanks to the higher immigration targets set by the Government of Quebec. A large majority (84 per cent) of the 55,000 immigrants that the province aims to welcome annually will settle in Montréal, and most will first choose to rent a dwelling. Immigration puts pressure on the Montréal rental market and keeps the vacancy rate low.</p>
<p>On the supply side, there have been fewer traditional rental housing starts in recent years, even though the vacancy rate has been relatively low. Builders still seem to be further attracted to more profitable markets, such as the condominium and retirement home segments. The rather limited growth of the rental housing stock is also helping to maintain the vacancy rate at a low level.</p>
<p>According to the survey results, larger apartments, that is, units with two bedrooms and those with three or more bedrooms, appear to be the most popular. In fact, demand for roomier units, notably from families, has been steady. The vacancy rates in these two unit categories reached 2.0 per cent and 1.7 per cent, respectively, well below the rates recorded for bachelor apartments (3.7 per cent) and one-bedroom units (3.2 per cent).</p>
<p>As well, the vacancy rates by rent range also revealed differences depending on unit size. In fact, apartments renting for less than $500 per month recorded the highest vacancy rate (3.2 per cent). These apartments are less popular, because they are usually smaller. By comparison, units with rents from $500 to $899 and apartments renting for $900 or over had lower rates, at 2.5 per cent and 2.8 per cent, respectively. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://moishe-alexander-cmhc.com/2009/12/rental-market-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2009 Canadian Housing Observer Released by CMHC</title>
		<link>http://moishe-alexander-cmhc.com/2009/11/key-report-2009-canadian-housing-observer-released-by-cmhc/</link>
		<comments>http://moishe-alexander-cmhc.com/2009/11/key-report-2009-canadian-housing-observer-released-by-cmhc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 19:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CMHC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[affordable housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alexander  Innovative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karen Kinsley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Key]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Observer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[part]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[population]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[year]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moishe-alexander-cmhc.com/?p=417</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Posted by Moishe Alexander Innovative approaches developed by the private sector, not-for-profit sector and all levels of government are increasingly driving the production of affordable housing, particularly for low-income households, reports the 2009 Canadian Housing Observer, released today by Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC). “The 2009 Canadian Housing Observer is unique in providing a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Posted by Moishe Alexander</p>
<p>Innovative approaches developed by the private sector, not-for-profit sector and all levels of government are increasingly driving the production of affordable housing, particularly for low-income households, reports the 2009 Canadian Housing Observer, released today by Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC).</p>
<p>“The 2009 Canadian Housing Observer is unique in providing a comprehensive annual examination of the key factors influencing the development of housing, a vital sector for Canada,” said Karen Kinsley, President of CMHC.</p>
<p>The 2009 Observer, CMHC’s flagship publication, details the private sector’s innovations in producing affordable housing, including providing direct support to tenants or homeowners through interest-free loans and measures to reduce housing costs through creative approaches to design, construction and renovation.</p>
<p>For their part, not-for-profit organizations are finding ways to provide affordable housing without on-going government support. For example, the Habitat for Humanity model is based on the concept of “partnership housing” where the potential homeowners contribute sweat equity and work alongside community volunteers and businesses to build homes.</p>
<p>Some municipal governments are also adopting new housing policies, including housing trust funds, donating land for affordable housing and reducing or waiving municipal fees.</p>
<p>Underpinning these efforts is support from federal and provincial/territorial governments, through flexible agreements that allow for innovative ideas, as well as financial and in-kind contributions.</p>
<p>Other key findings in this year’s Observer include:</p>
<p>    * Nationally, the incidence of core housing need decreased from 13.7 per cent in 2001 to 12.7 per cent in 2006, with most regions in the country following the national trend;<br />
    * The effects of the aging of Canada’s population over the next three decades and the important implications this will have on homebuilders, mortgage lenders and policy makers;<br />
    * The effect of immigration on population and household growth will become increasingly important;<br />
    * Housing starts were above the 200,000 unit level for the seventh consecutive year and housing-related spending contributed just over $300 billion to the Canadian economy in 2008;<br />
    * A water-sensitive approach to urban design is an important part of efforts to encourage the development of healthy, energy-efficient sustainable homes and communities.</p>
<p>In addition to the Observer, CMHC offers detailed online statistical housing information and analysis. This includes CMHC’s Housing in Canada Online interactive tool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://moishe-alexander-cmhc.com/2009/11/key-report-2009-canadian-housing-observer-released-by-cmhc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Housing Market Outlook Québec CMA</title>
		<link>http://moishe-alexander-cmhc.com/2009/11/housing-market-outlook-quebec-cma/</link>
		<comments>http://moishe-alexander-cmhc.com/2009/11/housing-market-outlook-quebec-cma/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 20:32:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ontario]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rental Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sudbury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[affordable housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boiler replacement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[roof replacement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afterthe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[canadian funding corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[census]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[course]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[holdingup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housingdemand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labourmarket]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metropolitanarea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moishe alexander]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Outlook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tosupport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[year]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moishe-alexander-cmhc.com/?p=409</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Québec census metropolitan area (CMA) stayed the course at the beginning of the year, as the labour market there continued to grow. After the first six months of the year, the job market in the CMA was on the rise and, as such, stood out from the other five metropolitan areas across Quebec, where [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Québec census metropolitan area (CMA) stayed the course at the beginning of the year, as the labour market there continued to grow. After the first six months of the year, the job market in the CMA was on the rise and, as such, stood out from the other five metropolitan areas across Quebec, where employment was down. Several sectors enjoyed growth, including construction, finance, and insurance and real estate.<br />
The third quarter results, however, revealed a very different picture</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://moishe-alexander-cmhc.com/2009/11/housing-market-outlook-quebec-cma/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

