Posts Tagged ‘return’

Posted by Moshe Alexander

Vacancy rate keeps rising According to the results of the latest CMHC Rental Market Survey conducted in October 2009, the rental apartment vacancy rate1 increased again in the Sherbrooke CMA. After climbing by 0.4 of a percentage point in 2008 to 2.8 per cent, the vacancy rate continued to rise in 2009, reaching 3.9 per cent. As shown in Figure 1, the rental market has now been easing more significantly for the past three years in the Sherbrooke area. However, the proportion of unoccupied units still remained far from the levels observed in the late 1990s, when more than 7 per cent of rental apartments were vacant.

In the other CMAs across the province, the Québec area still had the tightest rental market, with fewer than 1 per cent of apartments vacant. As for the Saguenay, Montréal and Gatineau areas, their proportions of unoccupied units remained relatively stable between October 2008 and October 2009, edging down from 1.6 per cent to 1.5 per cent in Saguenay and rising slightly from 2.4 per cent to 2.5 per cent in Montréal and from 1.9 per cent to 2.2 per cent in Gatineau. In the Trois-Rivières CMA, however, the vacancy rate was up, reaching 2.7 per cent (+1 percentage point). Among all of Quebec’s urban centres with 100,000 or inhabitants, Sherbrooke had the highest percentage of vacant rental housing units in 2009, for a second straight year.

Supply increases while demand slowsThe vacancy rate hike in the Sherbrooke CMA in 2009 resulted from a moderating demand and a rising supply.

On the demand side, migrants who come to an area, whether from other areas of Quebec or elsewhere, are definitely one of the main factors. In fact, most newcomers to an area choose to rent when they arrive. The relationship between migration and the vacancy rate is illustrated in Figure 3, with high net migration often being associated with a tighter rental market and the opposite also being observed.

Preliminary data2 show that no substantial immigration gains should be registered in the Sherbrooke CMA since the last survey. Stagnant immigration is no doubt one of the factors that contributed to moderating rental housing demand in the Sherbrooke area this year.

As well, the Sherbrooke CMA has recorded negative net interregional migration3 of about 100 people among the group aged from 15 to 34 years4, for the past two years. In other words, more young people left the capital of the Eastern Townships than settled there. This decrease therefore moderated demand for rental housing units, as the young population is an important client group on the rental market. In fact, according to data from the latest census (2006), most Sherbrooke area households whose primary maintainer is aged from 15 to 34 years are renters.

In addition to migration, several other factors contributed to slowing rental housing demand in the Sherbrooke CMA in 2009. One such factor was that the labour market was less favourable for young people (labour force aged from 15 to 24 years) between the October 2008 and October 2009 surveys. Compared to last year, the average employment level fell by 14 per cent among young people aged from 15 to 24 years, with this decrease mainly affecting full-time jobs (-24 per cent). In these conditions, many young people may have been deterred from leaving the family home, or encouraged to share accommodations, which also slowed demand on the rental market.
Changes in the age structure of a population (in this case, the aging of the population) may also have an effect on the proportion of unoccupied rental housing units in an area. According to our latest demographic projections, the growth in the number of young households (aged from 15 to 34 years) in the Sherbrooke area will be relatively weak, if not stagnant, between 2008 and 2009, which will limit the potential renter client pool. Negative growth is even forecast for the next few years, which will further curb demand on this market.

Another major reason for the vacancy rate increase is that financing conditions have been favourable to home buying, which means that a number of renter households possibly became homeowners. In fact, the strong sales of existing and new homes registered in the CMA in recent years seem to support this point. The same scenario was likely repeated in 2009, which again drove up the percentage of vacant units in the Sherbrooke area.

With such demand conditions and a rental housing supply that increased by 2.5 per cent between our last two surveys (from 30,842 units in 2008 to 31,621 in 2009), it was therefore not surprising to see a hike in the vacancy rate in 2009 in the Sherbrooke CMA.

Lastly, it should be mentioned that, even with the low vacancy rates observed in recent years, the growth in the supply on the rental market has been rather limited. It should not be forgotten that, in the late 1980s, rental housing construction had been very strong in the CMA, such that the vacancy rates had hovered around 10 per cent in the years that followed. Some builders may have then decided to focus their activities on other market segments. Now, even with the low vacancy rates registered in recent years, rental housing construction has never returned to its previous pace. This is generally the case, as a lag is often observed between changes in the vacancy rate on a market and the ensuing adjustment in the level of rental housing starts.

The residential housing market will remain strong in historical terms this year and next. A moderate rebound is expected to push total provincial housing starts higher in 2010, to 3,525 units, following a decline to 3,400 in 2009.

Economic growth in New Brunswick was limited in 2009 as exporters in the province continued to face a decline in global demand for commodities. Fewer exports have also had a negative impact on the manufacturing and transportation sectors in the province. No significant increase in economic growth is expected until a global recovery begins to take hold in 2010.

Despite economic uncertainty, the long term outlook for New Brunswick contains positive elements which will serve to support housing demand. For example, the last provincial budget for 2009-2010 focused on job creation, with $1.2 billion set aside for infrastructure programs and support to New Brunswick businesses. Notwithstanding, the return of sustained economic expansion will rely heavily on capital investment.

Employment in New Brunswick’s three large urban centres has been stable in 2009. As a result, positive net-migration continued in both Moncton and Fredericton, as each centre benefited from solid service, retail and construction sectors. Conversely, in-migration in Saint John, which has been muted in recent years, is not likely to change during the remainder of this year and in 2010. Reduced housing demand in all three centres has led to a lower level of activity in both the new home and resale markets. Employment levels are expected to remain flat in 2010; however, this should not significantly affect the housing market.

The Bank of Canada cut the Target for the Overnight Rate in the early months of 2009. The rate was 1.50 per cent at the start of 2009 and has since fallen to 0.25 per cent. The Bank has committed to keeping this rate at 0.25 per cent through the middle of 2010 unless inflationary pressures warrant an increase.

Mortgage rates have fallen over the course of 2009, but are now expected to remain relatively stable for the rest of the year. Posted mortgage rates will gradually increase through 2010, but will do so at a slow pace. For 2010, the one-year posted mortgage rate will be in the 3.50-4.25 per cent range, while three and five-year posted mortgage rates are forecast to be in the 4.50-6.00 per cent range.

Vince writes,

My problem is as follows: I am an immigrant who has been in Canada for 6-7yrs and have no RRSP room to speak of, and can only count on a small CPP. All my savings and investments are in a non-registered account.

How do I protect myself against inflation? Do I buy short term bonds (XSB), real return bonds, or do I stay with common shares?

My allocation if I include property is about 60/40 FI/Equities.

Inflation is certainly a hot topic for many investors since every pundit in the media has an opinion of where inflation will appear and to what degree of severity with hyperinflation being a term that’s been thrown around far too loosely as governments attempt to stimulate economies.

Any conservative investor, regardless of risk or investment style, needs to concern themselves with inflation in all market conditions because inflation affects the real value of your investments. If your investment portfolio returned 4% after costs last year and the inflation rate was 2% your real return for the portfolio was only 2%. What an investor wants to do is achieve returns in their portfolio that outpace inflation over the long-term and provide them with equal or greater purchasing power in the future.

Investing for inflation is really not much different than wanting a raise each year that matches your increases in the cost of living. Essentially your portfolio should be giving you a raise each year in your income to offset the increasing prices of goods and services you use.

To answer Vince’s answer directly it’s not whether he should invest in only short-term bonds, real return bonds or common shares but how much of each to hold over the long-term.

Short-term bonds provide decent inflation protection at the expense of a much lower yield than a longer yielding bonds because you’re not taking on the same interest rate risk. Real return bonds maintain your investment from inflation and you only need to buy a weighting large enough for your desired allocation. Common shares, specifically ones that pay dividends, offer an investor a few advantages in terms of protecting against inflation. Companies that own/operate inflation sensitive assets such as real estate, commodities and infrastructure tend to fare better in valuation terms than other companies. Some dividends stocks pay a dividend and increase that dividend on a yearly basis above the annual rate of inflation then have already achieved your desired goal if the dividend continues to be paid regardless of the effect on share prices. Because dividends, for Canadians, are eligible for the Dividend Tax Credit in a non-registered portfolio the taxation of dividends is less than that of gains from interest (bonds & GIC’s) or from capital gains.

http://www.nurseb911.com/2009/07/protecting-investments-from-inflation.html

reviewed by Moishe Alexander, CFC canadian funding corp CEO