Posts Tagged ‘cent’

Posted by Moshe Alexander

Results from Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation’s recently completed Rental Market Survey* revealed a higher vacancy rate for the Moncton CMA in the fall of 2009. In October of this year, the number of vacant units in Greater Moncton stood at 375. In comparison, there were 234 vacant units recorded at the time of last year’s Rental Market Survey. Consequently, the vacancy rate in Greater Moncton was up from last year’s level of 2.4 per cent to 3.8 per cent in the fall of 2009. The vacancy rate for the popular two bedroom units was consistent with the change in the overall vacancy rate, climbing from last year’s rate of 2.6 per cent to 3.6 per cent. This was not unexpected as two bedroom units account for approximately two thirds of the rental universe in the Moncton CMA. The vacancy rate for one bedroom units reached four per cent in the fall of 2009. This marked a significant increase from the low 1.5 per cent vacancy rate recorded last October. A general desire on behalf of local renters for the increased living space provided by two bedroom units has effectively reduced demand for one bedroom units. Within the tri-community area, Dieppe City had the lowest vacancy rate at 2.2 per cent, followed by the Town of Riverview and Moncton City at 3.4 and 4.0 per cent, respectively. In the outlying areas of the Moncton CMA, the vacancy rate rebounded from last year’s low of 0.9 per cent, climbing to 3.1 per cent. * The survey, completed during the first two weeks of October, is limited to privately initiated structures comprised of at least three rental units that were available for rent or completed before June 30, 2009.

In 2009, economic development in Greater Moncton continued to follow the same positive trend that has defined the region over the past decade. Overall employment, as of the end of October, was on pace to exceed last year’s record setting level. As a result of the stronger job market, Greater Moncton has enjoyed the strongest in-migration of all regions in the province during the past ten years. Housing market conditions in the Moncton CMA, starting last year, have become increasingly favorable to potential home owners. In particular, mortgage rates have remained at historically low levels and new listings have retreated moderately from record levels set in 2008. As a result, home ownership has moved within reach for a larger number of people in Greater Moncton, including those who currently are renters, thus limiting demand for rental units. In the tri-community area, the rental market in the Town of Riverview remained the most stable during the past 12 months, with the local vacancy rate remaining unchanged at 3.4 per cent. Rental unit demand had been on the rise in Riverview in recent years. Despite higher than average apartment starts in both 2007 and 2008, the vacancy rate declined in both years. In 2009, a decline in rental unit demand was offset by reduced rental unit construction, leading to the local vacancy rate remaining unchanged.

In Moncton City, the vacancy rate was comparable to the overall rate for the CMA at 4.0 per cent. Population growth has remained positive in Moncton City proper as the region’s economy continues to support economic development and attract people to the area. However, in-migration in 2009 has slowed compared to last year’s above average pace. In addition, apartment starts in Moncton City in 2008 were higher than the average for the last five years. This resulted in a relatively large infusion of new units in 2009 as projects started last year were completed. As such, local supply was ahead of demand with Moncton City’s vacancy rate rising to 4.0 per cent from last year’s level of 2.4 per cent. The vacancy rates in each of Moncton City’s four separate zones also increased in 2009. The largest fluctuation occurred in East Moncton. Last year, this zone posted Moncton City’s lowest vacancy rate at 1.9 per cent. In the fall of 2009, the vacancy rate in East Moncton was the highest at 4.6 per cent. In contrast, North Moncton had the lowest vacancy rate at 2.7 per cent. Not only was it the lowest, it was also the least changed among Moncton City’s four different zones, climbing 0.6 percentage points from last year’s rate of 2.1 per cent. In Central and West Moncton, the vacancy rate in the fall of 2009 was up to 4.5 and 3.6 per cent, respectively.

In the City of Dieppe, the vacancy rate inched up to 2.2 per cent in the fall of 2009, a moderate increase from 1.8 per cent last year. In general terms, population growth in Dieppe has outpaced both Moncton and Riverview in recent years. As a result, residential development has flourished in Dieppe. During this time, the popularity of semi-detached homes has increased resulting in tremendous growth in the Moncton CMA, with a significant number of new units added in the City of Dieppe as well. With semi-detached homes, consumers can obtain a newly-built product with a mortgage payment comparable to the typical monthly rent for a newer two bedroom apartment, while allowing the owner to build equity in their new home. As such, semi-detached units in Dieppe, which have nearly matched last year’s record setting pace in 2009, continue to lure renters to homeownership. This year, apartment starts are expected to post the third annual decline in Dieppe. However, with fewer consumers seeking rental units, supply and demand have maintained a relative balance, resulting in a moderate 0.4 percentage point change in Dieppe’s vacancy rate.

Posted by Moshe Alexander

The overall vacancy rate in Halifax stood at 2.9 per cent in October, down from 3.4 per cent last fall. Vacancy rates in the Halifax Regional Municipality (HRM) trended down in all submarkets but one in 2009. Average rents, based on structures common to both the 2008 and 2009 surveys, were up 2.8 per cent. In the HRM, Halifax City saw the largest decline in vacancies as the rate fell from 2.7 to 2.0 per cent in 2009. The Mainland North area of Halifax City saw the vacancy rate fall a full percentage point to 1.6 per cent. This submarket has a significant impact on the overall HRM vacancy rate as it is home to 28 per cent of the rental stock – the most of any submarket. On the other side of the harbor, Dartmouth City saw a more modest decline in vacancies from a rate of 5.5 to 5.2 per cent in 2009. Dartmouth North again saw the highest vacancy rate in the HRM at 5.6 per cent in 2009 while Dartmouth East recorded the only increase in vacancies – climbing from 4.4 to 5.4 per cent. The Metro Halifax vacancy rate of 2.9 per cent is only slightly higher than the national average of 2.8 per cent. Apart from Windsor, Halifax saw the largest decline in vacancies in 2009

with a 0.5 percentage point decrease. Canadian cities with the lowest vacancy rates in 2009 were Quebec City, Regina and St. John’s with rates of 0.6, 0.6 and 0.9 per cent respectively. Three of the cities with the highest vacancy rates, Calgary, Peterborough and Abbotsford also saw the largest increases in 2009 as vacancies climbed more than three percentage points in each of these major centres. Vacancy rates have remained relatively stable in Halifax for the past decade. In fact, the 2009 vacancy rate of 2.9 is only slightly below the ten-year average vacancy rate of 3.0 per cent. The vacancy rate has not fluctuated much over that time period, in spite of significant levels of new construction and new rental units being added to the supply. Over the past ten years, there have been approximately 585 new rental units added to the supply each year. Currently, there are nearly 600 more rental units under construction (as of October 2009) in the HRM most of which will be completed over the next 12 to 18 months. It is expected that current demand will be sufficient to offset the additional supply and keep vacancy rates within the recent ten-year range. Average rents in Halifax, increased by 2.8 per cent in 2009 compared to 2.0 per cent growth in both 2007 and 2008. This percentage increase is based on a fixed sample methodology including structures common to both this year’s and last year’s survey. Rents increased in response to the elevated demand that pushed vacancy rates downward. Based solely on this year’s sample, the average rent for a two- bedroom unit in Halifax was $877 in 2009. * The survey, completed during the first two weeks of October, is limited to privately initiated structures comprised of at least three rental units that were available for rent or completed before June 30, 2009.

Demand for two-bedroom units increased the most in Halifax in 2009. Two-bedroom units account for nearly 50 per cent of the rental stock in the city and saw the largest decline in vacancy rates from 4.2 to 3.3 per cent in 2009. The decrease in two-bedroom vacancies was largely impacted by the halving of the vacancy rate in Mainland North from 3.0 to 1.5 per cent. One and three-bedroom units saw more moderate vacancy rate declines from 2.8 to 2.4 per cent and from 2.9 to 2.7 per cent respectively. Bachelor units were the only bedroom-type to see an increase in the vacancy rate from 2.1 to 2.5 per cent in 2009. The vacancy rate in the south end of the Peninsula remained unchanged at 1.3 per cent with this area continuing to report the lowest rate in the HRM. Dartmouth North saw its vacancy rate decline from 6.1 to 5.6 per cent in 2009, but retained its 2008 position as having the highest vacancy rate in Halifax.

In terms of age, newer buildings continue to record the lowest vacancy rates, albeit slightly higher than last year. In buildings built since 2000, the vacancy rate increased from 0.8 to 1.0 per cent. This rate is less than half the rate of buildings built prior to 2000. Buildings built prior to 1974 saw the largest decline in vacancy rates of 1.3 percentage points. The oldest buildings (i.e., those built prior to 1960) saw vacancies decline from 4.5 to 3.2 per cent while the next oldest group (i.e., those built between 1960 and 1974) saw vacancies decline from 5.7 to 4.4 per cent. Based on building size, larger buildings continued to record the lowest vacancy rates in the city. Buildings with more than 100 units saw vacancies decline from 2.6 to 2.1 per cent. Smaller buildings with six to 19 units saw the highest vacancy rate of 3.8 per cent in 2009, but also the largest decline from 4.8 per cent in 2008.

The overall average rent increased 2.8 per cent in 2009 based on units common to both the 2008 and 2009 surveys. Three-bedroom units saw the largest increase of 3.1 per cent, while one-bedroom units saw the lowest increase in average rents of 2.6 per cent. Just as in 2008, the average rent increases for two- bedroom units matched the overall HRM increase of 2.8 per cent. In terms of submarkets, Peninsula South saw the most growth in average rents at 4.2 per cent while Dartmouth North saw the lowest increase in average rents of 1.9 per cent. Based solely on the 2009 survey data, the average rent for a two-bedroom apartment in Halifax was $877 per month as of October. Peninsula South remains the highest priced market in the HRM with an average two- bedroom unit renting for $1,318 per month which is 50 per cent higher than the overall HRM average. All other submarkets saw rents below the overall average except for Peninsula North which is just one per cent above the average. The lowest average rents can be found in Dartmouth South and Mainland South where two-bedroom units rent for $683 and $728 per month respectively. Newer buildings continue to

Posted by Moshe Alexander

In 2001, the vacancy rate in Charlottetown reached a record low of 1.8 per cent, as the construction of rental units was somewhat limited throughout the 1990′s. In response to the low vacancy rate, local developers built higher levels of rental buildings from 2002 to 2006. This strong level of rental construction resulted in a rising vacancy rate from 2003 to 2007. Last fall this trend was reversed, as the vacancy rate declined for the first time in five years due to reduced rental construction in 2007 and 2008. However, the vacancy rate inched back up this year as rental starts are once again on the rise. The increased level of construction pushed the vacancy rate for apartment structures containing three or more units in the Charlottetown CA to 3.4 per cent up from 2.3 per cent last year. The October 2009 survey aggregated the rental information for 3,888 rental units in the Charlottetown area, which was up from the 2008 figure of 3,790 units. Of the surveyed units, 131 were vacant in 2009, compared to 86 vacant units during the same period last year. The 2009 survey revealed that vacancies among two-bedroom units, which make up the majority of the local rental universe, were higher with 78 vacant units, compared to 54 units last year. As a result, the vacancy rate for two-bedroom units rose to 3.1 per cent from 2.2 per cent last year. Among the other unit types the change was more pronounced. One- bedroom units recorded the largest change, as the vacancy rate for these units increased from 2.0 per cent last year to 4.4 per cent in 2009.

Overall, the average rent in Charlottetown was $658 per month in 2009. For the fourth year in a row, CMHC is measuring the change in rents for existing structures (i.e., those common to the current and previous years’ surveys). Focusing on existing structures excludes the impact of new structures added to the rental universe between surveys and provides a better indication of the rent increase for existing structures. For the Charlottetown CA, the average rent for all bedroom types in existing structures increased by 4.8 per cent in October 2009 compared to a year ago. This year’s increase of 4.8 per cent is very close to the 5.0 per cent increase allowed for heated premises by the Island Regulatory and Appeals Commission (IRAC), which manages residential rental increases on the Island. As most of the units in the Charlottetown area include heat in the rent, it is not unexpected that the actual increase mirrored the increase allowed by IRAC. In 2009, there was very little reason to discount rents now that all of the projects built over the past six years have been integrated into the market. Also, owners were looking to increase rents in an effort to make up for the high heating costs experienced in the 2007/2008 winter due to the rapid rise in the price of heating oil. There was a significant difference in the increase in two-bedroom rents recorded in Zone 1 (Downtown) and Zone 2 (Peripheral). In Zone 1, the average two-bedroom rent advanced by 3.9 per cent, while in Zone 2 the increase was more impressive at 5.8 per cent, as measured by the fixed sample.

In addition to the vacancy and rent data that is collected each year as part of the annual Rental Market Survey, landlords and property managers were asked about rental unit availability. A rental unit is considered available if the existing tenant has given, or has received, notice to move, and a new tenant has not signed a lease; or the unit is vacant. Based on the results from the 2009 Rental Market Survey, the availability rate in the Charlottetown CA moved up to 4.9 per cent in 2009 from last year’s level of 4.0 per cent. Within the CA, the availability rate was identical in both Zones 1 and 2 at 4.9 per cent. Among the different bedroom types, one-bedroom units posted the highest availability rate in 2009 at 5.8 per cent. The availability rate for bachelor and two-bedroom units was 4.8 per cent for both.

According to the 2009 Rental Market Survey, the largest apartment buildings in the Charlottetown area command the highest average rents and enjoy the lowest vacancy rates. In the October survey, apartment buildings in the Charlottetown area with between 50 and 99 units posted the lowest vacancy rate at 1.8 per cent, which was well below the overall vacancy rate of 3.4 per cent. The second largest buildings in the area, ranging from 20 to 49 units, also saw lower vacancies with a rate of 3.0 per cent. In addition to having the lowest vacancy rate, the largest buildings also commanded the highest average rents. Buildings with 50 to 99 units had an average rent of $760, while the smallest structures, those with three to five units recorded an average monthly rent of $608. This escalation of rents from smaller to larger buildings is logical, when considering that more amenities tend to be offered to tenants as the building size increases. These features such as elevators, underground parking, security measures and common rooms raise the construction and operating costs for owners, which in turn are passed on to tenants.