The announcement was made by Patrick Brown, Member of Parliament for Barrie, on behalf of the Honourable Diane Finley, Minister of Human Resources and Skills Development and Minister Responsible for Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC).

“Through Canada’s Economic Action Plan, our government is taking action to help ensure our economic recovery and create the conditions for long-term growth,” said MP Patrick Brown. “Funding renovation and retrofit projects, like these ones, will not only improve the quality of life of the residents by keeping their homes safe and affordable but also help stimulate the local economy and create jobs.”

The Government of Canada, through Canada’s Economic Action Plan, announced $1 billion for social housing renovation and retrofit. Of the $1 billion, $850 million is being delivered by provinces and territories on a cost-matched basis for existing federally assisted social housing projects that they administer on behalf of the partnership. The remaining $150 million is being delivered by CMHC for existing federally assisted off-reserve housing that it directly administers. Eligible repairs include general improvements, energy-efficiency upgrades or conversions, and modifications in support of persons with disabilities.

As of February 1, 2010, CMHC is accepting applications from eligible project sponsors for the remaining $75 million funding for Phase II of Canada’s Economic Action Plan. Sponsor groups can apply online or through the mail. Eligible repairs include general improvements, energy-efficiency upgrades or conversions, and modifications in support of persons with disabilities.

The housing co-operatives that will receive contributions from the Government of Canada being announced today are as follows:
Gloucester, Birchwood Meadow Housing Co-operative $386,182
Sault Ste. Marie, Cambrian Co-operative Housing Corp. $316,215
Thunder Bay, Castlegreen Co-operative Inc. $239,300
Thunder Bay, Cataraqui Cooperative Homes Inc. $92,689
Ottawa, Elmvale Housing Co-operative Inc. $246,505
Timmins, Genesis Housing Co-operative Corp. $152,150
North Bay, Genesis Housing Co-operative $142,102
Sudbury, Place Verchères $138,400
Sudbury, Robin’s Nest Co-operative Homes Inc. $133,927
Ottawa, Sandy Hill Housing Co-operative $235,405
Sudbury, The Bob and Kay Carlin Co-operative $432,586
Barrie, Three Links Co-operative Housing $180,413
North Bay, La Co-op d’habitation la Seigneurie $34,207

“In the spirit of co-operation, Three Links Co-operative Housing will continue to strive to provide quality affordable housing to future generations,” said Denise Cornish, Member of the Board of Directors, Three Links Co-operative Housing. “Thanks to the Government of Canada and CMHC, for without the grant, this work could not have been completed.”

“We congratulate and thank the federal government, Minister Finley and CMHC for making a sound investment to renovate and retrofit these non-profit housing co­operatives,” said Patrick Newman, Ontario Regional Director on the board of the Co­operative Housing Federation of Canada. “This is an excellent example of stimulus that works; it will create and preserve jobs and protect a valuable source of affordable housing for vulnerable Canadians.”
Posted by Moishe Alexander.

The announcement was made by John Cummins, Member of Parliament for Delta-Richmond, on behalf of the Honourable Diane Finley, Minister of Human Resources and Skills Development and Minister Responsible for Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC).

“Through Canada’s Economic Action Plan, our government is taking concrete action to help ensure our economic recovery and create the conditions for long-term growth,” said MP John Cummins. “Funding renovation and retrofit projects like this one will not only improve the quality of life of its residents by keeping their homes safe and affordable for years to come, but also help stimulate the local economy and create jobs.”

Through Canada’s Economic Action Plan, the Government of Canada announced $1 billion for social housing renovation and retrofit. Of the $1 billion, $850 million is being delivered by provinces and territories on a cost-matched basis for existing federally assisted social housing projects which they administer on behalf of the partnership. The remaining $150 million is being delivered by CMHC for existing federally assisted off-reserve housing which it directly administers. Eligible repairs include general improvements, energy-efficiency upgrades or conversions, and modifications in support of persons with disabilities.

As of February 1, 2010, CMHC is accepting applications from eligible project sponsors for the remaining $75 million funding for year two. Sponsor groups can apply online or through the mail. Eligible repairs include general improvements, energy-efficiency upgrades or conversions, and modifications in support of persons with disabilities.

The housing co-operatives that will receive contributions from the Government of Canada being announced today are:
Ladner, The Mariner Cove $203,544
Vancouver, Connaught Housing Co-operative $241,839
Victoria, Craigflower Housing Co-operative $195,417
Vancouver, David Wetherow Housing Co-operative $64,574
Burnaby, Garden Square Housing Co-operative $613,350
Burnaby, Halston Hills Housing Co-operative $1,403,475
Vancouver, Killarney Gardens Housing Co-operative $2,893,514
Vancouver, Kitsun Co-operative Housing Association $412,634
Richmond, Klahanie Co-operative Housing Association $939,561
Vancouver, Marina Housing Co-operative $106,200
New Westminster, New Westminster Co-operative Housing Association $89,358
Vancouver, Tidal Flats Housing Co-operative $65,313
Burnaby, Whattlekainum Co-operative Housing $879,560

“We are very excited that the Mariner Cove has been granted federal funding through Canada’s Economic Action Plan,” said Bob Christofoli on behalf of the Mariner Cove. ”The planned renovations will not only make our complex more energy efficient, but will also provide an adequate environment for the future of our complex.”

Posed by Moishe Alexader

Pierre Lemieux, Member of Parliament for Glengarry – Prescott – Russell, on behalf of the Honourable Diane Finley, Minister of Human Resources and Skills Development and Minister Responsible for Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC), and Jean-Marc Lalonde, Member of Provincial Parliament for Glengarry – Prescott – Russell on behalf of Jim Bradley, Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing; along with Conrad Lamadeleine, Warden of the United Counties of Prescott and Russell, Jeanne Charlebois, Mayor of the Town of Hawkesbury, made the announcement.

“Our government is providing a hand up to those Canadians who need it the most,” said MP Pierre Lemieux. “We’re committed to making communities stronger through projects like this one here in Hawkesbury. These investments in local infrastructure will help create new jobs stimulate the local economy.”

“The province is committed to helping people who live on lower or fixed incomes stay in their home communities,” said MPP Jean-Marc Lalonde. “These 24 new affordable rental units are going to make a positive difference in the lives of the individuals living here, and make an excellent addition to the Town of Hawkesbury.”

The 24-unit project located at 300 Nelson Street received $2.88 million in funding through the two-year extension of the Canada – Ontario Affordable Housing Program and is sponsored by the Brisson/Labelle Partnership. The building will be occupied by individuals living on low incomes, including persons with disabilities and special needs.

“It is living proof that with partnerships between various levels of governments and the private sector, we can achieve important projects like this one and this participation will allow our community to enjoy more affordable housing,” said Warden Conrad Lamadeleine.

“We welcome this new housing development in our town and we congratulate Mr. Marc-André Labelle, Mr. Dominic Labelle and Mr. Jean-Luc Brisson for the opportunity they are offering our residents seeking affordable housing” said Mayor Jeanne Charlebois.

The Canada – Ontario Affordable Housing Program Agreement comprises a commitment of $301 million from each of the two senior levels of government. In total, the federal, provincial and municipal governments will invest at least $734 million in the program, which will provide affordable housing for up to 20,000 households in Ontario.

In 2008, the Government of Canada committed more than $1.9 billion over the next five years to improve and build new affordable housing and to help the homeless. Canada’s Economic Action Plan builds on this with an additional one-time investment of more than $2 billion over two years in new and existing social housing and lending of up to another $2 billion to municipalities for housing-related infrastructure. Combined for Ontario, this means a further $1.2-billion joint investment under the amended Canada – Ontario Affordable Housing Program Agreement. The federal and provincial governments are contributing equally to this overall investment.

Ontario is moving quickly to get new housing built. The province has already approved more than $224 million for construction-ready projects, which will improve access to affordable housing for low-income families, seniors and persons with disabilities across the province. It will also create jobs and strengthen local economies. To find out more about affordable housing in Ontario, visit www.mah.gov.on.ca.
Posted by Moishe Alexander.

The average rental apartment vacancy rate in Canada’s 35 major centres increased to 2.8 per cent in October 2009 from 2.2 per cent in October 2008. The centres with the highest vacancy rates in 2009 were Windsor (13.0 per cent), Abbotsford (6.1 per cent), Peterborough (6.0 per cent), Calgary (5.3 per cent), and London (5.0 per cent). On the other hand, the major urban centres with the lowest vacancy rates were Regina (0.6 per cent), Québec (0.6 per cent), St. John’s (0.9 per cent), Winnipeg (1.1 per cent), Kingston (1.3 per cent), and Victoria (1.4 per cent).

Demand for rental housing in Canada decreased due to slower growth in youth employment and improved affordability of homeownership options. Rental construction and competition from the condominium market also added upward pressure on vacancy rates.

The highest average monthly rents for two-bedroom apartments in new and existing structures were in Vancouver ($1,169), Calgary ($1,099), Toronto ($1,096), and Ottawa ($1,028). The lowest average monthly rents for two-bedroom apartments in new and existing structures were in Saguenay ($518), Trois-Rivières ($520), and Sherbrooke ($553).

Year-over-year comparison of rents in new and existing structures can be slightly misleading because rents in newly-built structures tend to be higher than in existing buildings. However, by excluding new structures, we can get a better indication of actual rent increases paid by most tenants. The average rent for two-bedroom apartments in existing structures increased in all major centres. The largest rent increases in existing structures were recorded in Regina (10.2 per cent), Saskatoon (8.3 per cent),Victoria (5.0 per cent), and St. John’s (4.9 per cent). Overall, the average rent for two-bedroom apartments in existing structures across Canada’s 35 major centres increased by 2.3 per cent between October 2008 and October 2009.

CMHC’s October 2009 Rental Market Survey also covers condominium apartments offered for rent in Calgary, Edmonton, Montréal, Ottawa, Québec, Regina, Saskatoon, Toronto,Vancouver, and Victoria. In 2009, vacancy rates for rental condominium apartments were below two per cent in seven of the 10 centres surveyed. Rental condominium vacancy rates were the lowest in Toronto, Saskatoon, and Ottawa. However, Regina and Edmonton registered the highest vacancy rates for condominium apartments at 3.0 per cent and 3.1 per cent in 2009, respectively.

The survey showed that vacancy rates for rental condominium apartments in 2009 were lower than vacancy rates in the conventional rental market in Ottawa, Saskatoon,Vancouver, Toronto, Edmonton, and Calgary. The highest average monthly rents for two- bedroom condominium apartments were in Toronto ($1,487),Vancouver ($1,448), Calgary ($1,310), and Victoria ($1,223). All surveyed centres posted average monthly rents for two- bedroom condominium apartments that were higher than average monthly rents for two-bedroom private apartments in the conventional rental market in 2009.

The vacancy rate throughout the St. John’s CMA (census metropolitan area) remained low in 2009. In fact, there was little change in the vacancy rate, which largely reflects the impact of solid economic activity and positive employment growth within the region. Robust residential construction activity, combined with healthy MLS®1 sales and a strong supply of existing homes for sale, translated into continued house price growth, once again making the transition from renting to home ownership challenging for renter households. CMHC’s rental market survey conducted during the first two weeks of October included the enumeration of 3,601 privately initiated apartment units within the St. John’s CMA. The survey identified 31 vacancies within the rental stock, translating into a vacancy rate of 0.9 per cent. This compares to a similar 0.8 per cent vacancy rate recorded in 2008, with the rate below one per cent now for two consecutive years and holding steady at its lowest level since 1980. The vacancy rate was one per cent or lower in every zone within the St. John’s area this year. The biggest change was within Remainder of Metro Area (zone 3), with a rate of 0.3 per cent compared to 0.8 per cent in 2008. St. John’s East (zone 1) posted a vacancy rate of 0.9 per cent versus 1.0 per cent last year. In St. John’s West (zone 2), the vacancy rate was 1.0 per cent compared to 0.7 per cent in 2008. St. John’s City (zones 1-2) posted a vacancy rate of 0.9 per cent versus 0.8 per cent a year earlier. Throughout the St. John’s region, vacancies remained highest in bachelor units at 1.5 per cent and lowest in three bedroom units at 0.4 per cent. The recorded vacancy rate for one and two bedroom apartments was 0.8 per cent for both. Average rents increased across the region for all bedroom types in 2009. The following percentage changes in average rent are based on the fixed sample, which includes structures common to the survey for both years (2008/2009). Bachelor unit average rents increased the most of all bedroom types at 6.2 per cent; one bedroom average rents increased 5.7 per cent; two bedroom unit average rents were up 4.9 per cent; and three bedroom rents increased 5.4 per cent. Overall, the total average rent for all bedroom types combined, advanced 5.5 per cent.

Based on the 2009 survey, bachelor unit average rents were $541; one bedroom average rents were $592; two bedroom units posted average rents of $677; and three bedroom rents came in at $713. Overall, the total average rent for all bedroom types combined was $643. The increase in average rents is a reflection of the upward pressure very low vacancies have exerted on rents since 2008, as well as increasing energy costs and the increased costs associated with operating and maintaining apartment buildings. Once again, current rent levels prevented the construction of multi-unit rental projects in 2009, making the rent/return equation uneconomical for developers and real estate investment trusts (REITs). This has been the situation for more than 20 years within the local rental market. However, local rental market dynamics have been changing, with fewer private owners and increasing corporate ownership. The buoyant St. John’s economy and housing market has seen these corporate entities become increasingly interested in the local rental market. In fact, they have purchased many apartment buildings in recent years. The expectation is that these and other players will engage in new multi-unit apartment building construction activity in the coming years, once average rents reach a point where project development becomes feasible.

The local rental market is driven by a number of factors. These factors have remained fairly constant over time and involve both demand and supply influences. Key factors affecting the demand dynamics for rental accommodations over the short term include economic activity, employment, migration trends and the home ownership rate. The supply side of the local rental market is affected by additions to the rental stock via new construction or conversion of existing space into apartments. Apartment supply can also be reduced by conversion activity when existing rental units get converted to condos or hotels. On rare occasions, demolition of apartments for alternate site use or loss due to fire may also diminish the supply of rental units. While CMHC’s rental market survey historically covered structures containing three or more apartment units only, both demand and supply has always been affected by competition from the secondary rental market (newly surveyed since 2007). This market consists of single-detached units; semi-detached, row and duplex units; and other- primarily accessory suites. Statistics for secondary rented units exclude apartments in purpose built rental structures with three rental units or more, condo apartments, units in institutions, and any dwelling whose type could not be identified in the survey. The estimated number of households in secondary rented units within the St. John’s CMA is quite substantial at 12,896, with an average rent of $653 compared to $618 in 2008. Refer to tables 5.1 and 5.2 for additional details regarding secondary rental market survey results.

Results from Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation’s recently completed Rental Market Survey* revealed a higher vacancy rate for the Moncton CMA in the fall of 2009. In October of this year, the number of vacant units in Greater Moncton stood at 375. In comparison, there were 234 vacant units recorded at the time of last year’s Rental Market Survey. Consequently, the vacancy rate in Greater Moncton was up from last year’s level of 2.4 per cent to 3.8 per cent in the fall of 2009. The vacancy rate for the popular two bedroom units was consistent with the change in the overall vacancy rate, climbing from last year’s rate of 2.6 per cent to 3.6 per cent. This was not unexpected as two bedroom units account for approximately two thirds of the rental universe in the Moncton CMA. The vacancy rate for one bedroom units reached four per cent in the fall of 2009. This marked a significant increase from the low 1.5 per cent vacancy rate recorded last October. A general desire on behalf of local renters for the increased living space provided by two bedroom units has effectively reduced demand for one bedroom units. Within the tri-community area, Dieppe City had the lowest vacancy rate at 2.2 per cent, followed by the Town of Riverview and Moncton City at 3.4 and 4.0 per cent, respectively. In the outlying areas of the Moncton CMA, the vacancy rate rebounded from last year’s low of 0.9 per cent, climbing to 3.1 per cent. * The survey, completed during the first two weeks of October, is limited to privately initiated structures comprised of at least three rental units that were available for rent or completed before June 30, 2009.

In 2009, economic development in Greater Moncton continued to follow the same positive trend that has defined the region over the past decade. Overall employment, as of the end of October, was on pace to exceed last year’s record setting level. As a result of the stronger job market, Greater Moncton has enjoyed the strongest in-migration of all regions in the province during the past ten years. Housing market conditions in the Moncton CMA, starting last year, have become increasingly favorable to potential home owners. In particular, mortgage rates have remained at historically low levels and new listings have retreated moderately from record levels set in 2008. As a result, home ownership has moved within reach for a larger number of people in Greater Moncton, including those who currently are renters, thus limiting demand for rental units. In the tri-community area, the rental market in the Town of Riverview remained the most stable during the past 12 months, with the local vacancy rate remaining unchanged at 3.4 per cent. Rental unit demand had been on the rise in Riverview in recent years. Despite higher than average apartment starts in both 2007 and 2008, the vacancy rate declined in both years. In 2009, a decline in rental unit demand was offset by reduced rental unit construction, leading to the local vacancy rate remaining unchanged.

In Moncton City, the vacancy rate was comparable to the overall rate for the CMA at 4.0 per cent. Population growth has remained positive in Moncton City proper as the region’s economy continues to support economic development and attract people to the area. However, in-migration in 2009 has slowed compared to last year’s above average pace. In addition, apartment starts in Moncton City in 2008 were higher than the average for the last five years. This resulted in a relatively large infusion of new units in 2009 as projects started last year were completed. As such, local supply was ahead of demand with Moncton City’s vacancy rate rising to 4.0 per cent from last year’s level of 2.4 per cent. The vacancy rates in each of Moncton City’s four separate zones also increased in 2009. The largest fluctuation occurred in East Moncton. Last year, this zone posted Moncton City’s lowest vacancy rate at 1.9 per cent. In the fall of 2009, the vacancy rate in East Moncton was the highest at 4.6 per cent. In contrast, North Moncton had the lowest vacancy rate at 2.7 per cent. Not only was it the lowest, it was also the least changed among Moncton City’s four different zones, climbing 0.6 percentage points from last year’s rate of 2.1 per cent. In Central and West Moncton, the vacancy rate in the fall of 2009 was up to 4.5 and 3.6 per cent, respectively.

In the City of Dieppe, the vacancy rate inched up to 2.2 per cent in the fall of 2009, a moderate increase from 1.8 per cent last year. In general terms, population growth in Dieppe has outpaced both Moncton and Riverview in recent years. As a result, residential development has flourished in Dieppe. During this time, the popularity of semi-detached homes has increased resulting in tremendous growth in the Moncton CMA, with a significant number of new units added in the City of Dieppe as well. With semi-detached homes, consumers can obtain a newly-built product with a mortgage payment comparable to the typical monthly rent for a newer two bedroom apartment, while allowing the owner to build equity in their new home. As such, semi-detached units in Dieppe, which have nearly matched last year’s record setting pace in 2009, continue to lure renters to homeownership. This year, apartment starts are expected to post the third annual decline in Dieppe. However, with fewer consumers seeking rental units, supply and demand have maintained a relative balance, resulting in a moderate 0.4 percentage point change in Dieppe’s vacancy rate.

The overall vacancy rate in Halifax stood at 2.9 per cent in October, down from 3.4 per cent last fall. Vacancy rates in the Halifax Regional Municipality (HRM) trended down in all submarkets but one in 2009. Average rents, based on structures common to both the 2008 and 2009 surveys, were up 2.8 per cent. In the HRM, Halifax City saw the largest decline in vacancies as the rate fell from 2.7 to 2.0 per cent in 2009. The Mainland North area of Halifax City saw the vacancy rate fall a full percentage point to 1.6 per cent. This submarket has a significant impact on the overall HRM vacancy rate as it is home to 28 per cent of the rental stock – the most of any submarket. On the other side of the harbor, Dartmouth City saw a more modest decline in vacancies from a rate of 5.5 to 5.2 per cent in 2009. Dartmouth North again saw the highest vacancy rate in the HRM at 5.6 per cent in 2009 while Dartmouth East recorded the only increase in vacancies – climbing from 4.4 to 5.4 per cent. The Metro Halifax vacancy rate of 2.9 per cent is only slightly higher than the national average of 2.8 per cent. Apart from Windsor, Halifax saw the largest decline in vacancies in 2009

with a 0.5 percentage point decrease. Canadian cities with the lowest vacancy rates in 2009 were Quebec City, Regina and St. John’s with rates of 0.6, 0.6 and 0.9 per cent respectively. Three of the cities with the highest vacancy rates, Calgary, Peterborough and Abbotsford also saw the largest increases in 2009 as vacancies climbed more than three percentage points in each of these major centres. Vacancy rates have remained relatively stable in Halifax for the past decade. In fact, the 2009 vacancy rate of 2.9 is only slightly below the ten-year average vacancy rate of 3.0 per cent. The vacancy rate has not fluctuated much over that time period, in spite of significant levels of new construction and new rental units being added to the supply. Over the past ten years, there have been approximately 585 new rental units added to the supply each year. Currently, there are nearly 600 more rental units under construction (as of October 2009) in the HRM most of which will be completed over the next 12 to 18 months. It is expected that current demand will be sufficient to offset the additional supply and keep vacancy rates within the recent ten-year range. Average rents in Halifax, increased by 2.8 per cent in 2009 compared to 2.0 per cent growth in both 2007 and 2008. This percentage increase is based on a fixed sample methodology including structures common to both this year’s and last year’s survey. Rents increased in response to the elevated demand that pushed vacancy rates downward. Based solely on this year’s sample, the average rent for a two- bedroom unit in Halifax was $877 in 2009. * The survey, completed during the first two weeks of October, is limited to privately initiated structures comprised of at least three rental units that were available for rent or completed before June 30, 2009.

Demand for two-bedroom units increased the most in Halifax in 2009. Two-bedroom units account for nearly 50 per cent of the rental stock in the city and saw the largest decline in vacancy rates from 4.2 to 3.3 per cent in 2009. The decrease in two-bedroom vacancies was largely impacted by the halving of the vacancy rate in Mainland North from 3.0 to 1.5 per cent. One and three-bedroom units saw more moderate vacancy rate declines from 2.8 to 2.4 per cent and from 2.9 to 2.7 per cent respectively. Bachelor units were the only bedroom-type to see an increase in the vacancy rate from 2.1 to 2.5 per cent in 2009. The vacancy rate in the south end of the Peninsula remained unchanged at 1.3 per cent with this area continuing to report the lowest rate in the HRM. Dartmouth North saw its vacancy rate decline from 6.1 to 5.6 per cent in 2009, but retained its 2008 position as having the highest vacancy rate in Halifax.

In terms of age, newer buildings continue to record the lowest vacancy rates, albeit slightly higher than last year. In buildings built since 2000, the vacancy rate increased from 0.8 to 1.0 per cent. This rate is less than half the rate of buildings built prior to 2000. Buildings built prior to 1974 saw the largest decline in vacancy rates of 1.3 percentage points. The oldest buildings (i.e., those built prior to 1960) saw vacancies decline from 4.5 to 3.2 per cent while the next oldest group (i.e., those built between 1960 and 1974) saw vacancies decline from 5.7 to 4.4 per cent. Based on building size, larger buildings continued to record the lowest vacancy rates in the city. Buildings with more than 100 units saw vacancies decline from 2.6 to 2.1 per cent. Smaller buildings with six to 19 units saw the highest vacancy rate of 3.8 per cent in 2009, but also the largest decline from 4.8 per cent in 2008.

The overall average rent increased 2.8 per cent in 2009 based on units common to both the 2008 and 2009 surveys. Three-bedroom units saw the largest increase of 3.1 per cent, while one-bedroom units saw the lowest increase in average rents of 2.6 per cent. Just as in 2008, the average rent increases for two- bedroom units matched the overall HRM increase of 2.8 per cent. In terms of submarkets, Peninsula South saw the most growth in average rents at 4.2 per cent while Dartmouth North saw the lowest increase in average rents of 1.9 per cent. Based solely on the 2009 survey data, the average rent for a two-bedroom apartment in Halifax was $877 per month as of October. Peninsula South remains the highest priced market in the HRM with an average two- bedroom unit renting for $1,318 per month which is 50 per cent higher than the overall HRM average. All other submarkets saw rents below the overall average except for Peninsula North which is just one per cent above the average. The lowest average rents can be found in Dartmouth South and Mainland South where two-bedroom units rent for $683 and $728 per month respectively. Newer buildings continue to

In 2001, the vacancy rate in Charlottetown reached a record low of 1.8 per cent, as the construction of rental units was somewhat limited throughout the 1990’s. In response to the low vacancy rate, local developers built higher levels of rental buildings from 2002 to 2006. This strong level of rental construction resulted in a rising vacancy rate from 2003 to 2007. Last fall this trend was reversed, as the vacancy rate declined for the first time in five years due to reduced rental construction in 2007 and 2008. However, the vacancy rate inched back up this year as rental starts are once again on the rise. The increased level of construction pushed the vacancy rate for apartment structures containing three or more units in the Charlottetown CA to 3.4 per cent up from 2.3 per cent last year. The October 2009 survey aggregated the rental information for 3,888 rental units in the Charlottetown area, which was up from the 2008 figure of 3,790 units. Of the surveyed units, 131 were vacant in 2009, compared to 86 vacant units during the same period last year. The 2009 survey revealed that vacancies among two-bedroom units, which make up the majority of the local rental universe, were higher with 78 vacant units, compared to 54 units last year. As a result, the vacancy rate for two-bedroom units rose to 3.1 per cent from 2.2 per cent last year. Among the other unit types the change was more pronounced. One- bedroom units recorded the largest change, as the vacancy rate for these units increased from 2.0 per cent last year to 4.4 per cent in 2009.

Overall, the average rent in Charlottetown was $658 per month in 2009. For the fourth year in a row, CMHC is measuring the change in rents for existing structures (i.e., those common to the current and previous years’ surveys). Focusing on existing structures excludes the impact of new structures added to the rental universe between surveys and provides a better indication of the rent increase for existing structures. For the Charlottetown CA, the average rent for all bedroom types in existing structures increased by 4.8 per cent in October 2009 compared to a year ago. This year’s increase of 4.8 per cent is very close to the 5.0 per cent increase allowed for heated premises by the Island Regulatory and Appeals Commission (IRAC), which manages residential rental increases on the Island. As most of the units in the Charlottetown area include heat in the rent, it is not unexpected that the actual increase mirrored the increase allowed by IRAC. In 2009, there was very little reason to discount rents now that all of the projects built over the past six years have been integrated into the market. Also, owners were looking to increase rents in an effort to make up for the high heating costs experienced in the 2007/2008 winter due to the rapid rise in the price of heating oil. There was a significant difference in the increase in two-bedroom rents recorded in Zone 1 (Downtown) and Zone 2 (Peripheral). In Zone 1, the average two-bedroom rent advanced by 3.9 per cent, while in Zone 2 the increase was more impressive at 5.8 per cent, as measured by the fixed sample.

In addition to the vacancy and rent data that is collected each year as part of the annual Rental Market Survey, landlords and property managers were asked about rental unit availability. A rental unit is considered available if the existing tenant has given, or has received, notice to move, and a new tenant has not signed a lease; or the unit is vacant. Based on the results from the 2009 Rental Market Survey, the availability rate in the Charlottetown CA moved up to 4.9 per cent in 2009 from last year’s level of 4.0 per cent. Within the CA, the availability rate was identical in both Zones 1 and 2 at 4.9 per cent. Among the different bedroom types, one-bedroom units posted the highest availability rate in 2009 at 5.8 per cent. The availability rate for bachelor and two-bedroom units was 4.8 per cent for both.

According to the 2009 Rental Market Survey, the largest apartment buildings in the Charlottetown area command the highest average rents and enjoy the lowest vacancy rates. In the October survey, apartment buildings in the Charlottetown area with between 50 and 99 units posted the lowest vacancy rate at 1.8 per cent, which was well below the overall vacancy rate of 3.4 per cent. The second largest buildings in the area, ranging from 20 to 49 units, also saw lower vacancies with a rate of 3.0 per cent. In addition to having the lowest vacancy rate, the largest buildings also commanded the highest average rents. Buildings with 50 to 99 units had an average rent of $760, while the smallest structures, those with three to five units recorded an average monthly rent of $608. This escalation of rents from smaller to larger buildings is logical, when considering that more amenities tend to be offered to tenants as the building size increases. These features such as elevators, underground parking, security measures and common rooms raise the construction and operating costs for owners, which in turn are passed on to tenants.

Demand for privately-initiated rental apartment units in the Windsor Census Metropolitan Area (CMA), switched gears and increased in 2009. The high vacancy rate declined from the record 14.6 per cent in October 2008 to 13.0 per cent in October 2009.Vacancy rates were lower for all apartment types except bachelors, where the vacancy rate increased to 16.9 per cent. Several key factors have contributed to the turnaround in the number of vacant rental apartments in Windsor this fall despite a slightly larger supply. Migration is a key factor in housing demand and outmigration from the Windsor area has lessened. Low unemployment rates draw migrants to a centre in search of work. Windsor’s unemployment rate has been well above the provincial average over the last five years. Not only has this poor employment scenario meant fewer people were moving to Windsor, it has also meant Windsor residents moved elsewhere in search of work. Now that the future regarding the Big Three auto makers is more stable and there is more positive news of upcoming employment opportunities, the number of people leaving the Windsor area is estimated to have peaked in 2008. Higher student enrollment has also exerted downward pressure on rental vacancy rates. In times of high unemployment and with the current government programs promoting retraining, both the University of Windsor and St. Clair College have recorded record high enrolment this fall. Many of these students turn to the rental market for accommodation. Many renters took advantage of favourable buying conditions to enter the homeownership market over the past two years as borrowing rates were low and home prices in the Windsor area were negotiable. As the bulk of this first-time buyer segment has moved through the market at this time, fewer renters were leaving this fall as prices began to recover. In contrast, renters were still leaving the townhouse segment due to the higher rents. The rent for a three-bedroom townhouse averaged $934 in October 2009, an amount which would easily allow for a monthly mortgage payment on a starter home in Windsor. The total vacancy rate for townhouse units increased from 11.7 per cent in 2008 to 12.5 per cent in 2009.

Vacancy rates were lower throughout the zones that make up the Windsor CMA. Downtown Windsor, Zone 1, declined slightly from 17.5 per cent the previous year to 15.6 per cent in 2009. The vacancy rate decreased for one and two bedroom units and was higher for bachelor units. Often renters move up to larger units as they become available. However, very high youth unemployment meant that demand was low for the most affordable rental accommodation. Zone 1 has traditionally had a higher vacancy rate than any other Windsor zone in part due to the large proportion of older structures which often require more repairs and therefore may be considered less desirable by potential tenants. On a positive note, the opening of a satellite campus for St. Clair College’s school of art and design brought about 200 students to the downtown this fall. Further expansion plans in conjunction with the University of Windsor’s music, theatre and fine arts programs could bring a further 700 students to the area within the next two years. The vacancy rate for one bedroom apartments was highest in Zone 2 at 18.9 per cent. This zone has a number of smaller buildings with primarily one bedroom apartments. Smaller buildings, such as those with less than 20 units tend to have higher vacancies during periods of oversupply as tenants have options and preferences for larger buildings which tend to have more security, and professional on-site management. Rents for one bedroom units in this zone remain low in an attempt to lure new tenants or retain existing occupants. Traditionally in Windsor the most popular location for renters to choose is Zone 3- East Outer which had the lowest overall vacancy rate in the City at 10.5 per cent, as well as the lowest one bedroom vacancy rate at 8.5 per cent. The latter was significantly lower than the one-bedroom vacancy rates in surrounding zones. This zone includes larger buildings with prime locations along the river which are more attractive to tenants. These buildings offer newer units and professional on-site management. As well the larger property management firms have the resources available to offer rental incentives which many smaller landlords do not.

The vacancy rate among apartments with at least three units (3+) in the Thunder Bay Census Metropolitan Area (CMA) inched up to 2.3 per cent in October 2009, from 2.2 per cent last year, according to Rental Market Survey (RMS) data released in December by Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC). (See Table 1.1.1) With the October vacancy rate’s slight increase, Thunder Bay now becomes the CMA with the tenth lowest vacancy rate for 33 centres with populations over 100,000 in Canada. Northern Ontario’s other major centre, Sudbury saw its rate rise to 2.9 per cent from 0.7 per cent last year. Meanwhile, elsewhere in Northwestern Ontario, Kenora’s vacancy rate declined to 0.8 per cent from 1.7 per cent in October 2008.

The vacancy rate in Thunder Bay was up only slightly this year as several opposing forces came into play. Improvement in homeownership affordability caused by falling interest rates has encouraged some renters to become homeowners. Low ownership costs in Thunder Bay combined with rising apartment rents reduced the relative cost of homeownership – dampening demand for rental accommodation. There are other factors that have added to rental demand and exerted downward pressure on vacancy rates. Although there has been a long-term out-migration amongst the 18 to 24 renter aged group, important trends emerged recently. Employment in the service sector and 18-24 age groups have held up reasonably well, possibly exerting slight upward pressure on rental demand, as young adults are more likely to rent rather than own. Overall, employment has fallen 5.5 per cent over the past year between the 2008 and 2009 surveys. However, the brunt of the job losses has been in the goods-producing sector and the 25-44 age group, arguably sectors not directly associated with rental demand. Next, demand coming from students in post-secondary institutions has increased rental demand. Enrolment in post-secondary institutions has been growing in Thunder Bay. Less space in student housing has caused spillover in the private market creating demand for units located in proximity to Lakehead University and Confederation College. Laid off workers returning to school as mature students are creating additional demand for private rentals. In addition, recent data has indicated no new sources of rental supply. Going back to 1998, there have been few rental completions added to the supply of rental units in Thunder Bay.

The availability rate1 is a slightly broader measure of what landlords have available to market to prospective tenants. The availability rate refers to the percentage of apartments that are either vacant or for which the existing tenant has given or received notice to move. Once again, availability rates moved in the same direction as the vacancy rate in Thunder Bay. Thunder Bay’s availability rate rose to 3.1 per cent from 2.7 per cent in 2008. Only one of the 15 metropolitan areas in Ontario had a lower availability rate than Thunder Bay, namely Kingston (2.5 per cent). Higher availability rates are a result of higher turnover. (See Table 1.4.)